WEiCU v King County Elections, part 2
using a subverted, corrupt judiciary to suppress investigation of (and deny) election fraud.
This is part 2 of WEiCU v King County Elections.
This was a real crap carnival. Any hopes of having a ruling that benefitted WEiCU (Washington Election Integrity Coalition - United) (and by extension, ‘We the People’), disintegrated within about 15 minutes of the proceedings.
Previously, the hearing was available via Zoom. For reasons decided by the court, it wasn’t offered as an option, and was in-person only. In addition to this continued secrecy, everyone was subject to secondary security screening, which included temporary confiscation of phones, laptops, and any devices that could be used for recording. People have been rightly suspicious of potential Deep State infiltration.
On Friday, June 2nd, there was a hearing regarding summary judgement (with a motion to dismiss), as well as a 'show cause' and 'declaratory judgement', regarding the ballots, voter records, and ballot images from the 2020 election, and whether WEiCU can audit them, for fact-finding ‘discovery’ for an election fraud lawsuit.
Aside from having to deal with approximately 45 minutes of legalese, case precedents, and statute codes, it became very clear how corrupt, and compromised the judiciary system in our state (which is a microcosm of the judiciary branch in our country), really is.
The initial motion to rule the ballots as anonymous, (which was initially granted) was denied. The summary judgement to have WEiCU's case dismissed, due to 'lack of procedure' was granted.
The 'pro se' plaintiff's case against King County Elections, was dismissed, due to 'lack of standing’. This included the case brought by Doug Basler, who’s run for Congress in Washington state’s 9th congressional district.
A lot of the problems I saw with the rulings (specifically, the declaratory judgement) in this case (aside from gross judicial errors), were the two cases brought by Tim White (White v Skagit County, and White v Clark County).
Those two cases were regarding the requirements, in which sealed ballots can be removed for auditing.
Even though the ballots can technically be considered 'anonymous', they have specific requirements, in which they can be unsealed (after the election, the ballots, whether legal or not, are sealed for a period of 60 days or more). Except by court order, or by the elections office (including the canvassing board), ballots can not be audited by the public. THIS IS A 1ST AMENDMENT VIOLATION, AT A MINIMUM...
In fact, according to RCW 29A.08.720, the voter registration (and by extension, ballots) are not viewable by the public, even though driver records and vehicle registrations ARE viewable via requests filed by law enforcement and attorneys…
In order to be able to view (and prove) any evidence of vote rigging, vote
flipping, violations of 'chain of custody', you typically go through a public records request.
Unfortunately, with the sorry, and inherently corrupt judiciary (as well as the legislature), being granted permission to view something that should be public, (which our elections ARE), have become virtually impossible. If our elections were transparent and honest, why resort to ‘legalese’ and ‘statude code’, to actively prevent the public from auditing the elections?
When you take a step back from the proceedings, the legalese, the condescension, and the bureaucracy, you end up with one thing: the confirmation of election fraud, and rigged elections. The important part: this corruption is being committed in plain, open view.
There's zero reason to deny investigation, or use 'legal maneuverings' (aka legalese) to deny such thing, unless you're directly benefitting from it.
The war for election integrity is far from over. This battle may have been lost, but with each battle, comes new information on the enemy, and how to effectively adapt and counter their moves. The more they deny the election fraud, the more complicit they become, and the more it confirms that we’re right.
Well we took a blow but we are still standing and we will go at it again. These laws that were passed in I’m assuming late night hours without much discussion should if been taken to court for being unconstitutional! Maybe it’s time.
This state has been so corrupt since 1985 with our last R Governor Spellman, prior to that was R Dan Evans in 1977 interrupted by D Dixy Lee Ray in 1981. Since 1985 & mail in voting we have had all courts held fast & tight by D judges, they will rule along party lines, the legalese was just theater to make it appear that we the people have no standing when in fact we do and always have. Case in point we were in a lawsuit in Tacoma, the judge we had threw out the case against us, only to have it brought anew by another party in the case heard by the wife of the first just who was just a pro-temp for another judge. She did not recuse herself when she should have and was friends of a dubious lawyer and the 2 agreed that they would not rule per law, but by emotion???? What kind of court law is emotion??? We lost, but being it was over a non revocable will & estate, the estate had to pay all of our legal fees not us. That was the only upside to this case. My husband was our lawyer pro se. So I sent a letter to the actual judge to complain about her illegal actions of her pro temp and she entered that letter into the case file as a black mark against the pro temp and fired her. So we know all about legalese and illegal actions in courts of law. This is a 3rd world county state.